After reading yet another post about the value of comments and public discussions (I believe it was Fred Wilson''s post), I thought "Why isn''t there a decentralized method of gathering a person''s comments on the web?" Services such as Disqus and IntenseDebate allow users to post on multiple sites with one account, but require the service to be set up on the blog site. Why not have a standardized way of collecting a person''s comments on any item, regardless of what application the originating site uses or what service the commenter uses?
\r\nHere''s how I envision it working: A user creates an account with an identity provider (e.g. OpenID, Facebook, etc.); she then provides a comment pingback address or is given one by the identity provider. When this user then leaves a comment at another site ("originating site") - logged in through the third party identity service - the originating site then "pings" (sends a POST request) to the comment pingback address it received from the identity provider as part of the user information. This ping would include the comment, the URL of the comment or the item to which the comment was directed, and perhaps other pertinent information.
\r\nUser---------------------[comment]---------------->Originating
site
Originating site-----[identity request]------>Identity
provider
Originating site<---[confirm identity]--------Identity
provider
Originating site<---[pingback address]----Identity
provider
Originating site-----[comment data]------->Pingback
address
My thoughts right now are that it would be
\r\n- \r\n
- Similar in function to a Trackback or pingback \r\n
- Tied to an identification system, such as OpenID \r\n
- Standardized and simple enough to be implemented quickly on virtually any site \r\n
Now I''m not real familiar with the OpenID spec, but I would like to see this comment pingback address be an optional extension of OpenID. The whole system described here is person-centric, and it makes sense to connect it to identity.
\r\nThe advantage of using this decentralized protocol is that users don''t need additional accounts with the various comment services. I realize that some of the comment services already accept OpenID or other identities, but with comment "pinging", the comments can be aggregated at a site of the user''s choosing, and there is no need to go "claim" comments.
\r\nOne final issue is security and spam prevention. My idea for this is to provide a unique pingback URL for each login or for each identity consumer (originating site).
Mac: 20-something man dressed fashionably, but casually. Slightly overweight.
Win: 20-something man wearing a suit, perhaps glasses. May carry briefcase. Very overweight.
Linux's: 20-something women of varying appearance, some wearing casual clothing, others wearing business clothing. May carry various accessories. Optionally, have Linux-related logo clothing.
"Dude what's up? Where's the posts?"
I know, I've been slacking. Excuse #1: My hard drive failed. Excuse #2: I'm leaving for a 24 hour flight at 6 a.m. tomorrow. Excuse #3: Holidays, duh.
OK, enough of that. In other news, I heard a few days back about someone finding giant rats in Indonesion, and what's the first thought that popped into my head? R.O.U.S., of course.
From MTV.com:
In third place, "The Golden Compass" earned only $9 million in its second week, a ghastly drop of 65 percent. While the flick is scoring decently overseas it's nothing short of a complete disaster stateside, with only $40 million after two weeks. Our pledge: We will continue to remind distributor New Line of this debacle until it is shamed into agreeing with Peter Jackson on terms for a "Hobbit" movie.
I am really glad this happened. It just goes to show you that Christianity is not dead here like it is in Europe.
I've decided to do two things with this post. First thing is to announce that I will be developing an Atom feed for the site. Sure there are other things that need to be done, like actually using the left column, but this sounds like more fun. And for me, this whole website is about having fun learning web standards.
In fact, I think I may have discovered the elusive purpose for my site. <choir of angels /> But, somebody else has undoubtedly done that. If I weren't so tired, I'd look it up. So, even if no one reads this (and I can't blame them) at least I'll know more about websites.
What was that other thing? Oh yeah, I'm gonna try not posting a long text (the part that doesn't show up on the front page or Facebook box). So here goes.